You're absolutely right in noting that CBIC Circular No. 105/24/2019-GST dated 28 June 2019 stands withdrawn by Circular No. 151/07/2021-GST, and in any case, it is not relevant to your current issue. That circular primarily dealt with intermediary services and classification issues, not RCM liability or timing of expense recognition, so it has no bearing on your facts.
Let’s visit this scenario and clarify everything you need to consider — you are not missing much, but there are key angles to confirm your tax and disclosure position.
✅ Restating the Scenario Briefly:
- Company A rented a premises starting Jan 2025.
- Vendor is unregistered — RCM applies on rent (assuming commercial property under Notification No. 13/2017–CT(Rate)).
- Rent invoices for Feb & Mar 2025 were raised only in April 2025 due to disputes.
- No provision was made in books in FY 2024–25.
- You're now evaluating RCM liability, GSTR-3B, and GSTR-9 disclosures, and whether you’ve overlooked anything.
🔍 GST RCM Treatment: What You’ve Captured Correctly
1. Time of Supply under RCM:
Per Section 13(3) (for services under RCM):
Time of supply is the earlier of:
- Date of payment, or
- 60 days from date of invoice
Since invoices were not issued in FY 2024–25, and payment (likely) wasn’t made either, time of supply arose only in April 2025 when invoices were issued.
✅ You are right: RCM liability did not arise in FY 2024–25. It arises in FY 2025–26, based on the facts.
2. GSTR-3B Disclosure:
In the April 2025 GSTR-3B:
- Report taxable value and GST under Table 3.1(d): “Inward supplies liable to reverse charge”
- Claim ITC under Table 4A(3) (assuming used for business)
✅ This is the correct reporting.
3. GSTR-9 Disclosure (FY 2024–25):
Since the RCM liability was not triggered in FY 2024–25 (due to absence of invoice/payment), there is:
- ❌ No need to report the RCM tax liability in Table 4G for FY 2024–25.
- ❌ No need to report ITC in Table 6C or Table 13 for FY 2024–25, since ITC is claimed in FY 2025–26.
✅ This is a key distinction — no GSTR-9 disclosure required in FY 2024–25, since both supply and liability occurred in FY 2025–26.
📌 Additional Points You Might Be Concerned About:
✅ You are not missing any circular, case law, or compliance requirement based on the current facts.
But you should:
- Ensure proper documentation of the dispute and reason for delayed invoicing — in case of audit.
- Keep records to justify why RCM liability was deferred (e.g., no invoice, no payment).
- If any payment was made in FY 2024–25 (e.g., part rent), you must check if RCM was triggered under the "date of payment" rule.
✅ Summary of Correct Approach (Based on Your Case):
Step
|
Description
|
📅 FY
|
RCM liability arises in FY 2025–26, not 2024–25
|
GSTR-3B
|
Report in April 2025 return – Table 3.1(d), claim ITC in Table 4A(3)
|
GSTR-9
|
No disclosure required in FY 2024–25 GSTR-9
|
Circular 105
|
❌ Not relevant here (withdrawn and unrelated)
|