As readers at TMI are well aware, through my article published & views shared under discussion forum, it is my constant view that no GST is payable by services provided by an intermediary, located in India to the recipient located located outside India.
I held this view because I feel that despite Section 13 (8) (b) & Section 7 (5) of the IGST Act, 2017, above-said services do not fall either under inter-state supply or intra-state supply.
One may refer to my article published on TMI on following link:
https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8346
And my views shared multiple views are this discussion forum. For example: Post ar serial No. 9 under Issue-ID: 116950 bearing subject-line as follows: GST on intermediary service
And my reading & interpretation of judgement given by third member G. S. KULKARNI, J., as reported in 2023 (4) TMI 821 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT says that 'no GST is payable in subject situation, despite holding that Section 13 (8) (b) of the IGST Act, 2017 is legal, valid and constitutional'.
But, one must also note that three judges of Bombay HC have given three different reasonings & thereby, different rulings about GST implications against services provided by an intermediary, located in India to the recipient located located outside India. They have very different interpretations about constitutional validity, Section 7 (5) & 13 (8) (b) of the IGST Act, 2017 & so on, among them.
Hence, it is needless to say & I am well aware that dispute / issues involved are very complex in nature and same will be ultimately settled only by Supreme Court .... sooner or later.
These are ex facie views of mine and the same should not be construed as professional advice / suggestion.