Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Appeal to be preferred in case of Order demanding penalty u/s 78A on director

Bishan Shah

Order issued to the company demanding service tax along with Interest and Penalty. Penalty is also imposed on the directors. In this case the appeal has been preferred by the company. Whether Director is also required to prefer appeal in the above matter?

Directors Must File Separate Appeals if Named in Tax Orders; Intent to Evade Tax Requires Proof A company received an order demanding service tax, interest, and penalties, including penalties on its directors. The company has appealed the order, and the question arises whether the director should also file a separate appeal. It was clarified that if the director was specifically named in the Show Cause Notice (SCN) and Order-in-Original (OIO), they must file a separate appeal. It was noted that penalties on directors require proof of intent to evade tax. References to relevant case law were provided to support this view. The discussion concluded with a consensus that the director should appeal separately. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues