Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

amendment of GSTR 1

FARIDUDDIN AHMAD

What procedure the tax payer has to follow for rectifying the discrepancies in the GSTR 1 compared to the figures reported in GSTR 3B if tax payer again committed mistake in amending GSTR 1 in Subsiquent month and no more opportunity to amend GSTR 1 is available to tax payer.

Taxpayer Seeks Solutions for GSTR-1 Amendment Errors; Experts Debate Use of Credit Notes and GSTR-9 Corrections A taxpayer inquired about rectifying discrepancies in GSTR-1 after mistakenly amending it, with no further amendment opportunities. One response suggested raising a credit note against the wrong invoice and issuing a new one, or notifying the discrepancies to the authorities with supporting documents. Another participant disagreed, noting credit notes are not for correcting GSTR-1 errors, and suggested correcting the error in GSTR-9 and informing the jurisdictional officer to prevent recovery proceedings. The discussion highlighted differing opinions on handling such errors, emphasizing the need for careful filing and communication with tax authorities. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues