Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 118253
Like 0 Bookmark

Section 151 of CGST Act

Date 29 Nov 2022
Replies 1 Reply
Views 2149 Views
Notice under Section 151 CGST Act used for input tax credit issues raises jurisdictional challenge and remedy options.
A taxpayer received a notice under Section 151 CGST followed by DRC 01 reply, DRC 07 order and DRC 13 attachment; the core question is whether allegations of ineligible input tax credit should have been pursued under Section 61 and whether the notice and orders are beyond the issuing officers' jurisdiction, prompting consideration of appeal or writ remedies. (AI Summary)

Greetings of the day !!!

One my clients received notice under Section 151 of CGST Act. Thereafter he served the Notice in DRC - 01 and subsequently received an order in DRC - 07.Thereafter attachment under DRC 13. I invite the attention of the Experts kindly throw some light on this issue. According to me if any availment of ITC, which is to be proved ineligible, then the officer has to serve the Notice under Section 61 but, in the said scenario notice issued under section 151. Is it correct ? if so, whether we have to prefer an appeal or file a WP before court of Law ? Seems the notice and orders are beyond the jurisdiction.

1 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Like 0
Replied on Nov 29, 2022
1.

I have shared my ex-facie views on this query under Issue ID - 118254

Recent Issues