Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 118204
Like 0 Bookmark

TAX VALUE BASED ON PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT OR ACTUAL COST

Date 31 Oct 2022
Replies 4 Replies
Views 1725 Views
Asked by
Valuation of works contracts: burden on taxpayer to prove actual or deemed allocation to avoid service tax revaluation.
Valuation of works contracts follows actual allocation of sale and service where segregation is available; Rule 2A prefers actual basis and places the burden of proof on the assessee seeking deemed allocation. Proof of tax payment on the sale portion is required to support exemption or concessional treatment. Purchase price in books is not necessarily the value of property in goods transferred, and payment under a VAT composition scheme may affect the department's ability to substitute purchase cost for contract valuation. (AI Summary)

MY CLIENT IS ONE OF THE WORKS CONTRACT SERVICE PROVIDER. FOR THE YEAR 2016-17, HE PAID THE TAX IN 60:40 BUT AS PER THE AUDITED PROFIT & LOSS ACCOUNT THE DEPARTMENT DEMANDED TO PAY SERVICE TAX BECAUSE THE COST OF MATERIAL IS LESS THAN 60%. THE DEPARTMENT HAS ASCERTAINED THE PURCHASE VALUE FROM THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS. ACTUALLY THE PURCHASE IS CORRECT. WHETHER ANY WAY TO PROVE 60% IS THE RIGHT ONE OR NOT? IF ANY JUDGMENTS OR NOTES AVAILABLE PLEASE PROVIDE

4 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues