Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 116086
Like 0 Bookmark

CESS ON CIGARETTES

Date 02 Mar 2020
Replies 7 Replies
Views 6323 Views
Input tax credit time-bar prevents belated cess credit claims and requires payment of unreported cess as output tax.
The dealer cannot now claim input tax credit for the omitted additional quantity based cess because the time bar under Section 16(4) precludes belated ITC claims for the earlier financial year; the correct course is to discharge the unreported output cess liability through the appropriate payment mechanism (for example, DRC 03) rather than treating it as available credit. (AI Summary)

A dealer who deals in sale of cigarettes has duly taken Input Tax Credit of

1) CGST

2) SGST

3) Compensation Cess (based on ad-valorem)

And he was under impression that he need not show output liability on Additional Cess (based on quantity of cigarettes) as it is same in both cases of sale and purchase. Further he has not shown input / output w.r.t such additional cess in GSTR-3B.

Now in this case assuming FY 2018-19:-

1) Should he report this additional cess output liability now in February 2020?

2) Will he be eligible to claim ITC of such additional cess now?

It is mentioned here that both input / output cess amount is same.

For example:- additional cess on cigrattes is ₹ 4,170 per 1,000 pcs on both purchase and sales transactions.

7 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues