Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsApp Join Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 116082
Like 0 Bookmark

seizure and confiscation under Customs Act

Date 29 Feb 2020
Replies 2 Replies
Views 3180 Views
Seizure under Customs Act: mahazhar and witness attestation required; mere letters insufficient, DRI may seize.
Validity of seizure under the Customs Act depends on compliance with evidentiary and procedural safeguards: an officer may seize goods believed liable for confiscation and bulky goods may remain with the owner under notice, but a seizure must be recorded in a mahazhar attested by two independent witnesses; mere letters are insufficient and no statutory provision substitutes an undertaking from the importer. (AI Summary)

Dear Experts,

When the seizure is valid as per the Customs Act? DRI can seizure the machinery without obtaining undertaking from the importer is valid seizure? Mere letter stating the seizure is valid in the eyes of law? In such situation confiscation is also valid in subsequent show cause notice issued for adjudication?

2 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Like 0
Replied on Feb 29, 2020
1.

Sir,

Seizure is valid only when the offended goods are seized under a mahazhar attested by two independent witness. Therefore mere letter stating seizure is not a valid seizure and subsequent issue of show cause notice and adjudication based on such notice is non-est in the eye of law.DRI has the power to seize the offending goods under mahazhar. I do not come across any provision under Customs Act for taking an undertaking from the importer.

Like 0
Replied on May 16, 2020
2.

Section 110 of the Customs Act empowers Customs Officer to seize the goods if he has reason to believe that such goods are liable for confiscation under Customs Act. Vehicle carrying the contraband goods can also be seized. If goods are bulky then it can be kept in possession of the owner himself and a notice be served on him that he should not remove or in any way with the goods (proviso to section 110 (1) of Customs Act.)

DRI can seizure the goods. However, mere letter stating the seizure is not valid unless until it is witnessed by Panch. CBIC vide Circular No. 1/2017-Cus dtd 08-02-2017 has issued instructions for seizure of goods.

Recent Issues