Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsAppJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 115490
Like 0Bookmark

IS PENALTY A REVENUE DUE TO THE STATE?

Date 04 Oct 2019
Replies12 Replies
Views 1927 Views
Penalty as revenue: statutory scope and territorial limits determine whether non imposition constitutes revenue loss.
Whether a penalty is revenue due to the State depends on the penalty provision's statutory scope and territorial application; where a court held the provision inapplicable to interstate transactions, penalty could not be treated as revenue due, and tribunal authority indicates non imposition of penalty does not automatically constitute revenue loss, while other authority holds lawful imposability of penalty alone is insufficient to deem an assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. (AI Summary)

Dear Experts.

Navarathri Greetings.

Under VAT statute, there was an ambiguity regarding the levy of penalty even for petty violation of provisions of the Act particularly in respect of documents being accompanied with the goods under transportation, some times without the knowledge of another State law, despite binding rulings on the subject. Subsequently the provisions were challenged before the Karnataka High Court.The revision order levying penalty in respect of interstate transaction was set aside by the State High Court on the ground that those provisions apply only to the State of Karnataka and not in respect State interstate transactions. since the State did not enjoy such jurisdiction.

Some are facing charges of purported loss of revenue on the ground of incorrect adjudication of penalty proceedings which were initiated despite the said State High Court judgement. Therefore in terms of the said State High Court judgement when the provisions to levy penalty did not apply to interstate transactions, the question of revenue due to the State does not arise at all. Factual and legal position being so, the question of loss of revenue naturally shall not come into existence.

Therefore it is requested to clarify what is revenue due to the State? In other words, is penalty a revenue due to the State? Relevant rulings, if any, are solicited.

12 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues