Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsAppJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 112002
Like 0Bookmark

NOTICE u/s 131 of IT act - REPLY to be made

Date 01 Jun 2017
Replies3 Replies
Views 6220 Views
Prohibition on holding demonetised notes: statutory ban and penalty attach, regardless of naming the purported owner.
Notice under income-tax summons addresses possession of demonetised currency seized during transportation. The statutory scheme prohibits holding, transferring or receiving specified bank notes after the notified cutoff, allowed deposit within an initial window, and provided remittance to the central bank with explanation if deposit deadlines were missed; penalties attach for contravention and liability depends on facts developed in summons proceedings. (AI Summary)

My client was named by a third party who was trapped by ATS authorities during transporting old currency notes of 500 and 1000.

Summon issued by Department on reference issue.

Obviously Client should deny the onus or shall name further of the persons actually owner of the currency.

Can you suggest me better remedy?

3 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide
Recent Issues