Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

WhatsAppJoin Channel
Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 111107
Like 0Bookmark

Section 36 Bad debt allowability

Date 08 Nov 2016
Replies1 Reply
Views 1221 Views
Asked by
Bad debt allowability may be denied when loans arise from third party fraud unless criminal complaint and corroborative evidence exist.
The core issue is whether bad debts are allowable under Section 36 when loans to illiterate borrowers were effected by intermediaries and secured by stolen articles, with the tax officer treating the advances as resulting from third party fraud; the reply stresses lodging a criminal complaint and producing corroborative records (FIR, investigation reports, KYC and lending documentation, and recovery efforts) to discharge the evidentiary burden and support claim of genuineness of the debt. (AI Summary)

My company is an nbfc.during the previous financial years it gave loan to illiterate customers based ustomers of kyc and signature,later it was found that article given as security in fact was stolen.and customers themselves were not knowing that they were taking loan.pawn brokers in actuals were taking the loan.now it officer siting third party fraud and there by disallowing the same.kindly help with case law

1 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Recent Issues