Sir,
As per rule 2 (d) (B) of Service Tax Rules, 1994, "person liable for paying service tax in relation to service provided or agreed to be provided by a goods transport agency in respect of transportation of goods by road, where the person liable to pay freight is,-
(I) any factory registered under or governed by the Factories Act, 1948 (63 of 1948);
(II) any society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 (21 of 1860) or under any other law for the time being in force in any part of India;
(III) any co-operative society established by or under any law;
(IV) any dealer of excisable goods, who is registered under the Central Excise Act, 1944 (1 of 1944) or the rules made thereunder;
(V) any body corporate established, by or under any law; or
(VI) any partnership firm whether registered or not under any law including association of persons;
any person who pays or is liable to pay freight either himself or through his agent for the transportation of such goods by road in a goods carriage:
Provided that when such person is located in a non-taxable territory, the provider of such service shall be liable to pay service tax.
In respect of above categories if GTA pays the service tax, the Department will take a stand that GTA is required to pay the service tax and the service tax is payable by consignor (freight paid cases) or consignee(freight payable cases) and demand will be raised against consignor or consignee. The Department will argue that service tax paid by GTA cannot be recognised as payment of service tax and they can claim the refund from the Department on the ground that GTA has paid the tax though they are required to pay. However they are cas law in which CESTAT has held that if GTA has paid the tax it cannot be demanded from consignor or consignee as the case may be again and if it is done so it will amount to double taxation.