Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Help required regarding amendment in Legal Service RCM

paresh ayadi

Sir,

I have two queries regarding amendment in finance bill, 2016 with regards to legal services.

1. Whether all Service by 'Senior Advocates' are liable for forward charge or only service provided to 'Junior Advocates' are under forward charge ??

2 - exe mption withdrawn on service provided by (i)....(ii) a person represented on an arbitral tribunal to an arbitral tribunal........What is meaning of it ??

Thanks

Clarification on Finance Bill 2016: Service Tax Implications for Senior Advocates and Arbitral Tribunals Explained A user sought clarification on amendments in the Finance Bill, 2016, regarding legal services and service tax implications for senior advocates and arbitral tribunals. The first query addressed whether all services by senior advocates fall under forward charge, confirming they do, with certain exemptions. The second query involved the taxation of services provided by individuals on arbitral tribunals, clarifying that such tribunals are non-judicial and serve as alternatives to courts. A follow-up rectified a previous statement, emphasizing that deputation between tribunals is taxable. The discussion concluded with acknowledgments for the informative responses. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues