Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 108799
Like 0 Bookmark

goods sold less than the stock inward from the other states

Date 23 Jun 2015
Replies 2 Replies
Views 1455 Views
Undervaluation in inter-state stock transfers: branch must prove arms length sale to rebut suppression assessment and penalties.
A branch sold stock transferred from its head office at prices lower than the inward value; the tax authority adjusted the trading account by imputing a margin, found discrepancies with physical stock and treated the difference as sales suppression. The primary legal contention is whether the branch can prove its sales were at arms length and not undervalued; demonstrating transfer pricing rationale, intercompany documentation, stock records and market-based pricing can rebut the department's reconstruction and suppression finding. (AI Summary)

Dear Experts,

One of our client have received stock transfer from their head office located in mumbai. And they are selling these goods within tamilnadu lesser than the value what they have received. After they are receiving the goods to branch in tamilnadu. Based on the quantity and as per their head office instructions they are selling these goods various customers. Based on the Stock Transfer Inward the branch has to issue form F to their Head Office Full value i.e. Inward Value. While doing so the sales tax enforcement wing came their premises for inspection and stating that, being the sales value is lesser than stock inward value and the authority concerned calculate the trading account. In that, they have made sales value (-) 10% G.P. i.e. cost of purchase worked out and compared with physical stock. Obviously the difference will come. Now, they have treated as sales suppression and made it for higher rate of tax with penalty.

Can u any one provide me any suitable case law to contend the assessment order. Now, they are preferred for an appeal.

With regards,

K. Thyagarajan.

2 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present.

Recent Issues