Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

renting of co-owned property

satbir singhwahi

Godowns are co-owned by by four persons with definite share

1.m- 35% , a- 20% , p-20%, pj 25%. registered land deeds are executed in their favour individually.

2. Rent is received individually with their pan .

3. Depatrment has issued SCN to Co-ownership to deposit service tax.

Now individually two persons are registered and paying tax.But two have receipts less than 9 lacs so not registered.

Please guide whether co-ownership should pay or individually.

Co-owners of godowns can claim service tax exemption individually if receipts are below 9 lakh, per case law. Four individuals co-own godowns and receive rent individually, with two registered for service tax and two not, as their receipts are below 9 lakh. A service tax notice was issued to the co-ownership. A consultant referenced a judgment allowing individual owners to claim exemption if their aggregate taxable services do not exceed the threshold. The judgment supports the argument that co-owners paying tax individually are not liable collectively. The case law cited suggests that each owner can benefit from the exemption, and the co-ownership should not be liable for additional service tax. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues