Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID :

Branch Transfer against Form F

Guest

Sir,

We are supplied material on 31st of october from our branch to head office in other state they have recd material in the month of 5th of November. we are supplied some more materials also in the month of November the recd same month itself. In that case they have issued Form F totally in month of November Itself. But in AG Audit they are not accepting the Form F. They ask we to pay Full tax. Please give us suggestion for this matter. 

Auditors demand full tax despite Form F submission; legal precedents suggest demand may be illegal. Separate declarations needed. A forum user raised an issue regarding the non-acceptance of Form F by auditors after transferring materials from a branch to a head office in a different state. Despite issuing Form F for all transfers in November, auditors demanded full tax payment. Responses included references to legal precedents where similar cases were resolved in favor of the taxpayer, suggesting that the demand may be illegal. Another response highlighted the need for separate declarations for transactions spanning different financial years, as per the Central Sales Tax Rules. (AI Summary)
answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues