Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitions under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing the criminal proceedings were maintainable and whether the complaint and evidence disclosed sufficient grounds to continue the case against the petitioners.
Analysis: The earlier order quashing part of the complaint did not require the prosecution to withdraw the complaint and file a fresh one after deleting the struck-off portions. Evidence could still be led on the surviving allegations, and no prejudice was shown merely because some offences had been quashed earlier. The complaint contained general and specific allegations of conspiracy, fabrication of records, filing of false returns, and use of forged documents, which were sufficient at the stage when the trial court was to consider framing of charges. Once the matter had reached the stage of charge and statutory remedies under the Code remained available, the inherent jurisdiction under section 482 could not be used to short-circuit the trial proceedings.
Conclusion: The petitions for quashing were not sustainable and the proceedings were liable to continue.
Final Conclusion: The Court refused to interdict the prosecution and directed the trial court to proceed with the cases expeditiously.
Ratio Decidendi: Inherent powers under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 should not be invoked to quash proceedings at the stage of framing of charges where the complaint discloses surviving allegations and statutory remedies before the trial court remain available.