https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9822 At the stage of framing charges, the Madras HC held that inherent power under section 482 CrPC should not be used to quash proceedings where the complaint and material disclosed surviving allegations of conspiracy, fabrication of records, false returns, and forged documents. The earlier quashing of part of the complaint did not require withdrawal of the complaint and refiling after deletion of the struck-off portions, and no prejudice was shown to the petitioners. As statutory remedies remained available before the trial court, the prosecution was allowed to continue and the trial court was directed to proceed expeditiously. en-us Wed, 12 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9822 At the stage of framing charges, the Madras HC held that inherent power under section 482 CrPC should not be used to quash proceedings where the complaint and material disclosed surviving allegations of conspiracy, fabrication of records, false returns, and forged documents. The earlier quashing of part of the complaint did not require withdrawal of the complaint and refiling after deletion of the struck-off portions, and no prejudice was shown to the petitioners. As statutory remedies remained available before the trial court, the prosecution was allowed to continue and the trial court was directed to proceed expeditiously. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 12 Jan 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=9822