Manufacturing waste and excisability: zinc dross and flux skimmings from galvanisation were held not to attract central excise duty.

Zinc dross and flux skimmings arising during galvanisation were treated as refuse or waste, not as a new marketable commodity with a distinctive name, character or use. Applying the settled excise principle that duty attaches only to goods emerging from manufacture as marketable products, the material was held not to be excisable goods and therefore not liable to central excise duty. On that footing, the impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed.

---

---

Issues: Whether zinc dross and flux skimmings arising during galvanisation of steel sheets are excisable goods liable to central excise duty.

Analysis: Zinc dross and flux skimmings arise as impurities during the galvanisation process and are in the nature of refuse or waste. Applying the settled principle that excise is attracted only to goods that emerge as a new, marketable commodity, the Tribunal followed the Supreme Court's view that dross and skimmings are not goods merely because they may be sold or may contain some recoverable metal. The material did not acquire a distinctive name, character or use as an end-product of manufacture.

Conclusion: The zinc dross and flux skimmings were not excisable goods and were not liable to central excise duty.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed because the disputed material was treated as manufacturing refuse rather than marketable excisable goods.

Ratio Decidendi: Waste or refuse arising in the course of manufacture is not exigible to excise duty unless it emerges as a marketable commodity having a distinctive commercial identity.

---