<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (8) TMI 349 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97419</link>
    <description>Zinc dross and flux skimmings arising during galvanisation were treated as refuse or waste, not as a new marketable commodity with a distinctive name, character or use. Applying the settled excise principle that duty attaches only to goods emerging from manufacture as marketable products, the material was held not to be excisable goods and therefore not liable to central excise duty. On that footing, the impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 16:06:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=134477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (8) TMI 349 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97419</link>
      <description>Zinc dross and flux skimmings arising during galvanisation were treated as refuse or waste, not as a new marketable commodity with a distinctive name, character or use. Applying the settled excise principle that duty attaches only to goods emerging from manufacture as marketable products, the material was held not to be excisable goods and therefore not liable to central excise duty. On that footing, the impugned order was set aside and the appeals were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=97419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>