Settlement applications under Customs law remain maintainable during pending proceedings, even if admitted duty was paid during investigation.

A settlement application under the Customs Act is maintainable while a show cause notice is still pending, because the statutory requirement is pendency of proceedings rather than pendency of a dispute. The Commission held that duty paid during investigation does not lose its character as duty merely because adjudication is unfinished, and prior payment does not bar admission of the application. The settlement scheme can operate at any stage of a case concerning levy, assessment and collection, and amounts already paid may be adjusted against the admitted liability. One Member dissented, taking the view that the applicant must still owe additional duty at the time of filing.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether an application for settlement under the Customs Act is maintainable when a show cause notice is pending even though the duty demanded has already been paid during investigation.

Analysis: The majority held that the statutory requirement under Section 127B is pendency of a proceeding and not pendency of a dispute. A show cause notice constitutes a pending proceeding until it is finally disposed of. The Commission further held that payment made during investigation does not cease to be duty merely because adjudication has not yet concluded. The settlement scheme applies at any stage of a case relating to levy, assessment and collection, and the provisions do not exclude applications merely because the admitted duty has already been deposited. Early payment cannot bar admission, and the amount already paid may be adjusted against the admitted liability.

Conclusion: The settlement applications were maintainable and were allowed to be proceeded with, with the amount already paid directed to be adjusted against the admitted duty liability.

Dissenting Opinion: One Member held that the applicant must, as on the date of filing, accept an additional amount of duty still payable thereafter, and that an application filed after full payment of the admitted duty was not intended to serve merely as a vehicle for immunities.

Ratio Decidendi: For admission of a settlement application, the decisive requirement is pendency of proceedings under the Customs Act, and prior payment of the admitted duty during investigation does not by itself bar maintainability where the proceeding remains pending.

---