Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether untrimmed copper sheets/circles captively consumed by the assessee were marketable and therefore dutiable, and whether the plea of non-marketability could be raised for the first time before the Tribunal.
Analysis: The assessee did not raise the plea of non-marketability before either the adjudicating authority or the first appellate authority. In the absence of such a plea, it was not open to the assessee to contend at the Tribunal stage that the Department had failed to prove marketability. Marketability is a question of evidence, and a new case could not be introduced at the final appellate stage. Captive consumption by itself does not establish that goods are not marketable. The record disclosed nothing to show that the impugned goods were incapable of sale, and the Tribunal treated them as marketable. The earlier decision relied on by the assessee was distinguished on the ground that, in that matter, the Department had produced no evidence of marketability, whereas here the point had never been raised below.
Conclusion: The untrimmed sheets/circles were held to be marketable and dutiable, and the plea of non-marketability was rejected as unavailable at the Tribunal stage.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the duty demand on the untrimmed sheets/circles was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Marketability must be disputed at the proper stage, and captive consumption alone does not negate excisability where nothing on record shows that the goods are not saleable.