Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the obligation under Rule 173Q(1)(bb) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, read with its Explanation, required the assessee to verify the identity and address of the manufacturer or supplier through reasonable steps, and whether the question of law arising from the Tribunal's order should be referred to the High Court under Section 35G(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The order under reference had followed earlier Tribunal decisions and treated it as impracticable to expect the assessee to verify the genuineness of the original manufacturer where gate passes had passed through intermediary hands and the supplier was located elsewhere. The Reference Application raised a substantial question on the scope of the statutory obligation, and the order recognized that the reasonable steps contemplated by the Explanation included satisfaction through personal knowledge, a familiar certifying signature, or a certificate issued by the jurisdictional Superintendent of Central Excise.
Conclusion: The question of law was held to arise and the matter was referred to the High Court.