Fair hearing and remand: premature adjudication was set aside where the assessee was denied adequate opportunity to respond.

Premature adjudication without waiting for a pending proceeding before the Tribunal, coupled with denial of adjournment and adequate time to place evidence, was treated as inconsistent with fair procedure. The adjudicating authority was expected to consider the relevant departmental circular and afford a proper opportunity before finalising classification-related issues. On that basis, the order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh consideration and de novo adjudication after due hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned adjudication order was vitiated for denial of adequate opportunity and whether the matter required remand for reconsideration.

Analysis: The matter was pending before the Tribunal on an application seeking restraint on further adjudication, and the adjudicating authority proceeded to decide the case before the Tribunal's order was communicated. The appellant had also sought adjournment till the outcome of the pending proceedings and relied upon the departmental circular indicating the relevant classification position. The adjudicating authority was required to consider the evidence and afford a fair opportunity before finalising the matter. In these circumstances, the denial of time and the premature finalisation of the adjudication did not accord with fair procedure.

Conclusion: The order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh consideration after granting opportunity to the appellant.

Final Conclusion: The dispute was sent back for de novo adjudication, and the appellant obtained relief to that extent.

Concurring Opinion: The accompanying opinion agreed with remand and further noted that the Tribunal had power under Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules and Section 35C of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 to issue directions to secure the ends of justice, and that the appellant had been denied adequate opportunity when the request to await the Tribunal's order was ignored.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a pending proceeding before a superior forum bears directly on the adjudication and a fair opportunity to adduce evidence is not afforded, the resulting order is liable to be remanded for fresh decision after due hearing.

---