Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit could be denied when the goods were originally cleared for export without payment of duty but, before receipt in the appellant's factory, duty was subsequently paid and evidenced by a certificate of the jurisdictional Range Superintendent.
Analysis: Rule 57E was held to cover variation in credit where duty is subsequently paid before receipt of the inputs, even if the goods were originally cleared at nil rate for export under bond. The decisive consideration was that duty had in fact been paid on the goods before they were received by the appellant, and the certificate issued by the Range Superintendent furnished valid evidence of such payment. No other non-compliance under the Modvat scheme was established by the revenue.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to Modvat credit and the denial of credit was unsustainable.