<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (1) TMI 227 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85021</link>
    <description>Rule 57E permitted Modvat credit where duty was paid on the inputs before their receipt in the factory, even though the goods had originally been cleared for export without duty under bond. The crucial factor was actual payment of duty prior to receipt, and the certificate issued by the jurisdictional Range Superintendent was accepted as valid proof of that payment. As no other non-compliance with the Modvat scheme was established, denial of credit was unsustainable and the appellant was entitled to Modvat credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 12:21:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=122088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (1) TMI 227 - CEGAT, MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85021</link>
      <description>Rule 57E permitted Modvat credit where duty was paid on the inputs before their receipt in the factory, even though the goods had originally been cleared for export without duty under bond. The crucial factor was actual payment of duty prior to receipt, and the certificate issued by the jurisdictional Range Superintendent was accepted as valid proof of that payment. As no other non-compliance with the Modvat scheme was established, denial of credit was unsustainable and the appellant was entitled to Modvat credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=85021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>