Functional classification of printed articles determines exemption: sealed packet inserts are not labels, while converted wrappers are paper articles.

Printed articles must be classified by their essential function and end-use: a printed item closed on all sides and sealed, used in a cigarette packet, was treated as a container or case rather than a mere label, so it fell outside the exemption meant for printed labels. Printed wrappers were treated differently: because they were printed and cut to size for wrapping use, they were regarded as converted type of paper under Heading 4817.90 rather than labels. Exemption under Notification No. 49/87 was unavailable for the earlier period because it took effect only from 1 March 1987.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the product described as printed labels was classifiable as labels or as cigarette cases/containers and entitled to exemption under Notification No. 228/86 as amended. (ii) Whether the product described as wrappers was classifiable as printed labels or as converted type of paper under Heading 4817.90 and whether it qualified for exemption under Notification No. 49/87 for the relevant period.

Issue (i): Whether the product described as printed labels was classifiable as labels or as cigarette cases/containers and entitled to exemption under Notification No. 228/86 as amended.

Analysis: The product was found, on examination of the cigarette packet, to be a printed paper closed on all sides and sealed, functioning as a printed container or case rather than a mere label. Its purpose of indicating the manufacturer, product name and quantity did not alter its essential character. The product therefore did not answer the description of a label and could not claim the exemption meant only for printed labels.

Conclusion: The printed labels were correctly classifiable under Heading 4818.13 and were not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 228/86 as amended.

Issue (ii): Whether the product described as wrappers was classifiable as printed labels or as converted type of paper under Heading 4817.90 and whether it qualified for exemption under Notification No. 49/87 for the relevant period.

Analysis: The wrappers were held to be printed sheets of paper used for wrapping and not labels. The reasoning accepted that printing and cutting to size could amount to conversion, and that such products acquire characteristics of an article of paper rather than remaining plain paper. At the same time, the exemption under Notification No. 49/87 could not apply to the disputed period because that notification came into force only from 1 March 1987, while the classification dispute related to an earlier period. The Board's circular and the end-use of the product supported the classification as converted paper, but not the exemption for the prior period.

Conclusion: The wrappers were classifiable under Heading 4817.90 as converted type of paper used for wrapping, but they were not eligible for exemption under Notification No. 49/87 for the period prior to 1 March 1987.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the extent that the wrappers were held to be converted paper rather than a mere printing paper, while the claimed exemption for the earlier period was denied and the printed labels remained classifiable as cigarette cases or containers.

Ratio Decidendi: For classification, the essential functional character and end-use of the printed article must be considered; a printed article that serves as a closed wrapping or container is not a mere label, and printed wrapping paper that has been converted by printing and cutting acquires the character of an article of paper, though exemption depends on the temporal and substantive scope of the notification.

---