Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether printed soap wrappers are articles of paper and, if so, whether they fall outside the credit restriction under Notification No. 177/86-C.E. as amended, thereby making the demand for differential Modvat credit unsustainable.
Analysis: The input in question was printed soap wrappers. The order-in-original treated them as falling under Chapter Heading 4823.19 and, on that basis, applied the restricted credit limit under Notification No. 177/86-C.E. However, the finding contained no adequate discussion showing why the wrappers were correctly classifiable within the restricted category. The materials and the earlier Tribunal decisions relied upon showed that printed wrappers used for packing are articles of paper and not mere paper or paperboard. On that classification, the notification restricting credit to paper and paperboards did not apply to the present inputs. The demand based on excess credit therefore could not be sustained.
Conclusion: Printed soap wrappers were held to be articles of paper, not covered by the credit restriction in the notification, and the demand for differential Modvat credit was set aside in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to the Modvat credit claimed on the printed soap wrappers, and the impugned demand order was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Printed wrappers used for packing, when classifiable as articles of paper, are outside a notification that restricts credit only for paper and paperboards.