Ordinary meaning and market identity govern exemption claims for packing sleeves treated as boxes or cartons.

Bulb sleeves and tube light sleeves used for packing electric bulbs and tube lights were not shown to be "printed boxes and cartons" for exemption purposes. The Supreme Court approved the Tribunal's approach of construing the notification by ordinary meaning, functional character, and market identity, and it accepted the finding that the open-ended sleeves were not boxes or cartons in their ordinary sense and lacked evidence of independent market recognition as such. Because no error was shown in the factual appreciation or legal principle applied, the exemption ruling was upheld and the revenue's challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether bulb sleeves and tube light sleeves manufactured for packing electric bulbs and tube lights are "printed boxes and cartons" classifiable to excise duty, and whether they were exempt under the relevant exemption notification.

Analysis: The dispute turned on the meaning of "boxes" and "cartons" in the exemption notification and the tariff entry for paper and paperboard packing containers. The Tribunal had held that the sleeves were not boxes or cartons in their ordinary sense, since they were open-ended sleeves without lids, and had also noted the absence of positive evidence showing that the goods were known in the market as boxes or cartons. The record did not establish that the sleeves had an independent market identity as printed boxes or cartons, and their use was largely for captive consumption in the manufacturer's own packing process. The Court found that the Tribunal had adopted a correct approach in considering both the literal meaning of the expressions used in the notification and the functional use of the goods, and that no error had been shown in the appreciation of facts or in the legal principle applied.

Conclusion: The sleeves were not shown to be printed boxes or cartons within the meaning of the exemption notification, and the Tribunal's finding that they were exempt from duty was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the revenue's challenge to the Tribunal's classification and exemption ruling was rejected.

Ratio Decidendi: For exemption under a tariff notification, the goods must answer the description used in the notification on a proper reading of their ordinary meaning, functional character, and market identity; where the goods are not shown to be known in the market as the described exempted articles, the exemption cannot be denied merely because they are used as packing material.

---