Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported ionisation smoke detector was importable under Open General Licence as a sensor or component, or whether it was a complete instrument requiring a specific import licence and liable to confiscation.
Analysis: The imported item was shown by the technical literature to function as a smoke detector that sensed smoke and transmitted signals to the fire alarm control unit. The evidence also showed that the licensing authority treated similar goods as falling under Open General Licence, and prior clearances of the same item had been allowed as sensors. The objection that the item was a self-contained instrument was not supported by the record, and the appellants' tariff description did not operate as estoppel against them.
Conclusion: The item was held to be importable under Open General Licence as a sensor, not as a prohibited complete instrument, and the confiscation-based denial of clearance was unsustainable.