Income-tax deductions and foreign tax credit cannot be denied merely for accounting treatment or procedural delay

Section 80JJAA allows deduction for additional employee cost over the statutory three-year period, so a later-year claim is not barred merely because the amount relates to earlier eligible years. Disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D requires proper dissatisfaction with the accounts, and where the assessee has made a suo motu disallowance and own funds far exceed investments, the presumption is that investments came from interest-free funds. AJIO marketing and advertisement expenditure was treated as revenue in nature because it comprised recurring business outlays, and accounting treatment alone did not control tax character. CSR-linked donations to an otherwise eligible section 80G institution were held not excluded merely because the spending arose from CSR obligations. Foreign tax credit could not be denied solely for delayed filing of Form 67 where the claim and tax payment details were otherwise available.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether deduction under section 80JJAA could be allowed for the eligible additional employee cost pertaining to earlier assessment years as part of the statutory three-year allowance; (ii) whether the disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D was rightly deleted; (iii) whether AJIO marketing and advertisement expenditure was revenue in nature; (iv) whether deduction under section 80G was allowable in respect of CSR-linked donations made to an eligible institution; and (v) whether foreign tax credit could be denied merely because Form 67 was filed after the due date under section 139(1).

Analysis: On section 80JJAA, the allowance is linked to the additional employee cost of the year of initial eligibility and the statute permits the deduction for three assessment years, so the later-year claim is not barred merely because the amount relates to earlier eligible years. On section 14A, the assessee had made a suo motu disallowance, the Revenue failed to establish any cogent dissatisfaction with the accounts, and the assessee's own funds were far in excess of investments, attracting the presumption that investments were from interest-free funds. On the AJIO issue, the expenditure consisted of recurring advertisement, sales promotion, digital marketing and related outlays for an existing business channel, and capitalization in the books under accounting standards did not determine its tax character. On the section 80G issue, CSR expenditure disallowed under section 37(1) is not thereby excluded from Chapter VI-A where the donation is otherwise to an eligible section 80G institution and the statute contains only limited express CSR-based exclusions. On foreign tax credit, delay in filing Form 67 was held to be procedural, and the substantive credit could not be denied on that ground alone where the claim and tax payment details were otherwise on record.

Conclusion: The Revenue's objections on sections 80JJAA, 14A and the AJIO expenditure were rejected, while the assessee succeeded on the section 80G claim and the foreign tax credit claim was restored for verification, with the legal grounds on limitation left open as academic.

Final Conclusion: The common order substantially upheld the relief granted to the assessee on merits, deleted the CSR-linked disallowance under section 80G, and sent the foreign tax credit issue back for limited verification, leaving the limitation challenge undecided.

Ratio Decidendi: A deduction or credit otherwise allowable under the Income-tax Act cannot be denied solely because of an adverse accounting treatment or a procedural delay, unless the statute expressly bars the claim or the Revenue discharges the required statutory burden with proper dissatisfaction based on the accounts.

---