Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2019 (2) TMI 697 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules on tax deductions, exempts income, ROC charges. The Tribunal upheld the deductibility of pre-operative expenses as revenue expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the nature ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rules on tax deductions, exempts income, ROC charges.

                          The Tribunal upheld the deductibility of pre-operative expenses as revenue expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the nature of the expenses over their treatment in the books. It directed the AO to delete the additional disallowance of expenses related to exempt income, finding it amounted to double taxation. The issue of ROC charges paid for increasing authorized capital was remanded for re-examination to determine if they were for issuing bonus shares, potentially qualifying as revenue expenditure. The revenue's appeals were dismissed, while the assessee's appeals were partly allowed, reflecting a comprehensive review of each issue.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Disallowance of pre-operative expenses.
                          2. Disallowance of expenses incurred in relation to exempt income under Section 14A read with Rule 8D.
                          3. Disallowance of ROC charges paid for increasing authorized capital.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Pre-operative Expenses:
                          The primary issue revolved around whether pre-operative expenses, treated as capital in the books of account, could be claimed as revenue expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee argued that these expenses, incurred in the nature of salaries, wages, travelling expenses, and other administrative costs, were for the expansion of its existing restaurant business and should be deductible as revenue expenditure. The CIT(A) agreed with the assessee, noting that the expenses were incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the existing business and did not result in the creation of a capital asset or enduring benefit. The Tribunal upheld this view, emphasizing that the nature of the expenditure, rather than its treatment in the books, determines its deductibility under Section 37(1). The Tribunal cited various judicial precedents, including decisions from the Bombay High Court and the Madras High Court, which supported the treatment of such expenses as revenue expenditure when incurred for business expansion.

                          2. Disallowance of Expenses Incurred in Relation to Exempt Income:
                          The assessee challenged the disallowance of Rs. 2,69,162 under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii), arguing that it had already made a suo moto disallowance of Rs. 2,75,214 for expenses related to exempt income. The Tribunal found that the AO had not verified whether the disallowance made by the assessee covered the administrative expenses under Rule 8D(2)(iii). Since the assessee's disallowance already included such expenses, the Tribunal concluded that the AO's additional disallowance amounted to double taxation, which is impermissible. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the additional disallowance.

                          3. Disallowance of ROC Charges Paid for Increasing Authorized Capital:
                          The AO disallowed Rs. 4,97,181 paid as ROC charges for increasing authorized capital, treating it as capital expenditure based on the Supreme Court's decision in Brooke Bond India Ltd vs CIT. However, the assessee contended that the ROC fees were for issuing bonus shares, which should be considered revenue expenditure, citing the Supreme Court's subsequent decision in CIT vs General Insurance Corporation. The Tribunal acknowledged the need to re-examine the nature of the ROC fees in light of this decision. It remanded the issue to the AO for verification, instructing the AO to consider the assessee's claim that the ROC fees were for issuing bonus shares and, if substantiated, to treat the expenditure as revenue in nature.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal's consolidated order addressed the disallowance of pre-operative expenses, emphasizing the nature of the expenses over their treatment in the books. It also rectified the double disallowance of expenses related to exempt income and remanded the issue of ROC charges for further examination. The appeals by the revenue were dismissed, while the assessee's appeals were partly allowed, reflecting a thorough analysis of the legal and factual aspects of each issue.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found