Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(i) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applied to a company so as to justify the addition made on account of difference between documented value and market value of flats sold.
Analysis: The assessee was admittedly a company. The provision invoked by the Assessing Officer applies to an individual or a Hindu undivided family and not to a company. Since the basic jurisdictional condition for applying the provision was absent, the addition could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The provision was inapplicable to the assessee and the addition was deleted.
Ratio Decidendi: A taxing provision can be applied only to the class of assessees expressly covered by it, and where the assessee does not fall within that class, the addition made under that provision cannot survive.