<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 139 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784383</link>
    <description>Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(i) applies only to an individual or Hindu undivided family, not to a company. As the assessee was a company, the basic jurisdictional condition for invoking the provision was absent, so the addition based on the difference between documented value and market value of flats could not be sustained and was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 08:03:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875619" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 139 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784383</link>
      <description>Section 56(2)(vii)(b)(i) applies only to an individual or Hindu undivided family, not to a company. As the assessee was a company, the basic jurisdictional condition for invoking the provision was absent, so the addition based on the difference between documented value and market value of flats could not be sustained and was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>