TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Customs broker licence revocation and penalty dispute over denied cross-examination and documents; Rule 14 action upheld, SLP dismissed</h1> The dominant issue was whether revocation of a customs broker licence under Rule 14 of the CBLR, 2018 and imposition of penalty under Regulation 18 for ... Revocation of customs broker license under Rule 14 of the CBLR, 2018 - levy of penalty under Regulation 18 of the CBLR, 2018 - violation under Regulation 10(a), (d), (e), (m) and (n) respectively - non-extension of an opportunity to cross examine Customs Officers - Failure to produce relevant documents to the appellant at the time of issuance of Show Cause Notice - it was held by High Court that the appellant's license revocation and penalty imposition were valid and justified under the CBLR, 2018. HELD THAT:- There are no good ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. SLP dismissed. After hearing counsel for the petitioner(s) and considering the materials on record, the Supreme Court declined to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Article 136 to interfere with the High Court's impugned order. The Court recorded that it found 'no good ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court,' and, on that basis, dismissed the Special Leave Petition. As a consequence of the dismissal, any pending application(s) were also disposed of. The order reflects a summary rejection on merits at the threshold stage, without issuing notice to the respondent(s) or providing further reasons beyond the absence of sufficient grounds for interference.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
