https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784305 The dominant issue was whether revocation of a customs broker licence under Rule 14 of the CBLR, 2018 and imposition of penalty under Regulation 18 for breaches of Regulations 10(a), (d), (e), (m) and (n) were vitiated by denial of cross-examination of customs officers and non-supply of relevant documents with the show cause notice. The SC found no basis to disturb the HC's conclusion that the disciplinary action was valid and justified under the CBLR, 2018, and declined interference in exercise of its jurisdiction. The SLP was dismissed, and the licence revocation and penalty were sustained. en-us Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784305 The dominant issue was whether revocation of a customs broker licence under Rule 14 of the CBLR, 2018 and imposition of penalty under Regulation 18 for breaches of Regulations 10(a), (d), (e), (m) and (n) were vitiated by denial of cross-examination of customs officers and non-supply of relevant documents with the show cause notice. The SC found no basis to disturb the HC's conclusion that the disciplinary action was valid and justified under the CBLR, 2018, and declined interference in exercise of its jurisdiction. The SLP was dismissed, and the licence revocation and penalty were sustained. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784305