Discretionary interference refused after complaint was sent to a freshly constituted Internal Complaints Committee.

A complaint had been referred to a freshly constituted Internal Complaints Committee, and the Court found no basis to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction to intervene at that stage. The petitioner was left free to raise all objections, including limitation, before the Committee, which was expected to consider the matter independently and without influence from prior observations. The petition was accordingly not entertained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Court should exercise its discretionary jurisdiction to interfere with the matter after the complaint was referred to a freshly constituted Internal Complaints Committee.

Analysis: The complaint had already been referred to a newly constituted Internal Complaints Committee for examination. In that situation, the Court found no reason to invoke its discretionary jurisdiction. The petitioner was left at liberty to raise all contentions, including limitation, before the Committee, which was expected to proceed uninfluenced by prior observations.

Conclusion: The Court declined to interfere and dismissed the petition.

---