<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 746 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779950</link>
    <description>A complaint had been referred to a freshly constituted Internal Complaints Committee, and the Court found no basis to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction to intervene at that stage. The petitioner was left free to raise all objections, including limitation, before the Committee, which was expected to consider the matter independently and without influence from prior observations. The petition was accordingly not entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 746 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779950</link>
      <description>A complaint had been referred to a freshly constituted Internal Complaints Committee, and the Court found no basis to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction to intervene at that stage. The petitioner was left free to raise all objections, including limitation, before the Committee, which was expected to consider the matter independently and without influence from prior observations. The petition was accordingly not entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>