Crushing and screening of iron ore alone does not amount to manufacture of concentrates for excise duty.

Mere crushing and screening of iron ore, without beneficiation or other special treatment that removes foreign matter or improves grade, does not amount to manufacture of iron ore concentrates for central excise purposes. As no new commercial commodity emerged, the duty demand failed, and the connected penalty could not survive once the levy itself was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed.

---

---

Issues: Whether crushing and screening of iron ore lumps amounts to manufacture of iron ore concentrates so as to attract central excise duty, and whether the demand of duty, interest and penalty was sustainable.

Analysis: The activity undertaken was confined to crushing and screening of iron ore to reduce size and segregate the material as per industrial requirement. The record did not show any beneficiation or special treatment that removed foreign matter or improved the grade of ore so as to transform it into concentrates. In the absence of such conversion, the process did not result in a new commercial commodity attracting duty. Since the duty demand itself was unsustainable, penalty could not survive.

Conclusion: The activity did not amount to manufacture, the duty demand was not sustainable, and the penalty also could not be sustained.

Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal succeeded with consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Mere crushing and screening of iron ore, without beneficiation or other special treatment that converts ore into concentrates, does not constitute manufacture for central excise purposes.

---