Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether crushing and screening of iron ore, undertaken by or on behalf of the assessee, amounted to manufacture of iron ore concentrate under Chapter Note 4 to Chapter 26 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and whether the resulting iron ore lumps and fines remained exempt as ores.
Analysis: The process in dispute was confined to raising, crushing and screening of iron ore, resulting only in size reduction and segregation. No beneficiation or special treatment removing foreign matter or enriching ferrous content was shown. The term "concentrate" is understood, in the absence of a tariff definition, in light of the HSN Explanatory Notes as ore from which part or all foreign matter has been removed by special treatment. The Department did not establish the use of any such treatment or the existence of a concentration process, and the settled position in earlier decisions was that crushing and screening, by themselves, do not amount to conversion of ore into concentrate.
Conclusion: The process did not amount to manufacture of iron ore concentrate, and the demand of central excise duty, together with interest and penalty, was unsustainable. The assessee succeeded.