<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1138 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776950</link>
    <description>Mere crushing and screening of iron ore, without beneficiation or other special treatment that removes foreign matter or improves grade, does not amount to manufacture of iron ore concentrates for central excise purposes. As no new commercial commodity emerged, the duty demand failed, and the connected penalty could not survive once the levy itself was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 08:33:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=845090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1138 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776950</link>
      <description>Mere crushing and screening of iron ore, without beneficiation or other special treatment that removes foreign matter or improves grade, does not amount to manufacture of iron ore concentrates for central excise purposes. As no new commercial commodity emerged, the duty demand failed, and the connected penalty could not survive once the levy itself was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=776950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>