Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order could be sustained where the tax demand exceeded the amount specified in the show cause notice, and whether the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The writ petition questioned the assessment order on the limited ground that the demand quantified in the order was higher than the demand stated in the notice issued under DRC 01. The parties also agreed that, in the peculiar facts, the matter could be sent back for fresh consideration on payment of a reduced amount. The Court accordingly directed a de novo exercise by the assessing authority, treating the impugned assessment order as a show cause notice and permitting objections with supporting material, failing which the earlier assessment would stand restored.
Outcome: The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with the petitioner required to make the stipulated deposit and file objections within time.