Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
AI Drafter ✕

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now →
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS
PrevPreviousNextNext

2025 (2) TMI 350

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....q For the Petitioner : Mr. Harish Bindumadhavan For the Respondents : Mr. C. Harsha Raj Additional Government Pleader ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 16.08.2024 on the limited ground that the impugned order insofar as the amount of tax demanded in the impugned order is in excess of the amount which was specified in notice under DRC 01. 2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Crores which was set out in the impugned order. In response the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the mandate of Section 75(7) would still be violated inasmuch the tax demanded is in excess of the amount specified in the notice. 4. In view of the peculiar facts, it was suggested that Rs. 2 crores may be paid and the matters be remanded back for a fresh consideration, which w....

PrevPreviousNextNext