2025 (2) TMI 351
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Honourable Mr. Justice Mohammed Shaffiq For the Petitioner : Mr. G. Natarajan For the Respondents : Mr. V. Prashanth Kiran, Government Advocate. ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order passed by the first respondent dated 10.10.2023 relating to the assessment year 2017- 18. 2. The petitioner is engaged in the business of providing rental services of i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....erved on the petitioner by tender or sending it by RPAD, instead it had been uploaded in the GST Portal, thereby, the petitioner was unaware of the initiated proceedings and was thus unable to participate in the adjudication proceedings. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that if the petitioner is provided with an opportunity, they would be able to explain the alleged ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....for the respondents does not have any serious objection. 5. By consent of both parties, the writ petition stands disposed of on the following terms: a) The impugned order dated 10.10.2023 is set aside. b) The petitioner shall deposit 25% of the disputed taxes as admitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondents, within a period of four weeks from the date ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....titioner of the balance amount, if any, on intimation in compliance with the above direction shall be completed within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. e) Failure to comply with the above condition viz., payment of 25% of disputed taxes within the stipulated period i.e., four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order shall result in resto....


TaxTMI