Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether, in a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a sole arbitrator could be appointed where the arbitration agreement was admitted and no moratorium or legal bar arising from the pending insolvency proceedings was shown.
Analysis: The scope of examination at the Section 11 stage is confined to verifying the existence of an arbitration agreement. The agreement between the parties contained a clear arbitration clause covering disputes arising out of or in connection with the loan agreement. A notice invoking arbitration had been issued under Section 21 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and there was no dispute on the existence of the arbitration clause. The pendency of insolvency proceedings did not, by itself, bar the present petition, as no moratorium or order preventing arbitration was brought on record. In these circumstances, an independent arbitrator was required to be appointed. Any objection as to jurisdiction or arbitrability could be raised before the arbitrator under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Conclusion: The petition for appointment of a sole arbitrator was maintainable and was allowed; the dispute was referred to arbitration before an independent sole arbitrator.