<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1075 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762089</link>
    <description>At the Section 11 stage, the court&#039;s enquiry is limited to checking whether an arbitration agreement exists. Where the arbitration clause is admitted and covers disputes arising out of or in connection with the contract, a sole arbitrator may be appointed. Pending insolvency proceedings do not, by themselves, bar appointment of an arbitrator unless a moratorium or other legal restraint is shown on record. Objections to jurisdiction or arbitrability may be raised before the arbitrator under Section 16. On these principles, the petition for appointment of an independent sole arbitrator was maintainable and the dispute was referred to arbitration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2024 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=779021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1075 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762089</link>
      <description>At the Section 11 stage, the court&#039;s enquiry is limited to checking whether an arbitration agreement exists. Where the arbitration clause is admitted and covers disputes arising out of or in connection with the contract, a sole arbitrator may be appointed. Pending insolvency proceedings do not, by themselves, bar appointment of an arbitrator unless a moratorium or other legal restraint is shown on record. Objections to jurisdiction or arbitrability may be raised before the arbitrator under Section 16. On these principles, the petition for appointment of an independent sole arbitrator was maintainable and the dispute was referred to arbitration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=762089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>