Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte dismissal of the assessee's first appeals by the appellate authority, after granting only a short time to comply, violated the principles of natural justice and justified setting aside the orders with a remand for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The appellate authority had issued successive notices allowing less than seven days for compliance. Such a truncated opportunity was treated as neither real nor reasonable, and therefore not an effective chance to present evidence or contest the additions. The requirement of fair hearing was held to be substantive and not a mere paper formality. Since the assessee was deprived of a meaningful opportunity to support the returns and grounds of appeal, the ex parte appellate orders were found unsustainable. The proper course was to restore the matters for fresh consideration and require separate speaking orders after granting effective hearing opportunities.
Conclusion: The ex parte appellate orders were set aside and the matters were remitted for de novo adjudication after granting the assessee a reasonable opportunity of hearing.
Ratio Decidendi: An appellate order passed without granting a real and reasonable opportunity of hearing, especially where the time allowed for compliance is too short to enable effective participation, violates natural justice and must be set aside for fresh adjudication.