Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment orders were sustainable in view of the alleged violation of principles of natural justice and denial of adequate opportunity to submit a reply.
Analysis: The assessees were served with notice in the afternoon requiring comments by the next morning, leaving insufficient time to prepare and file a reply. The record showed that a request for more time had been made, yet the assessment was completed the very next day. The absence of a fair opportunity to respond amounted to a gross violation of natural justice, and the appellate dismissal did not cure that defect.
Conclusion: The assessment orders could not be sustained and were quashed, with liberty to the respondents to proceed afresh by issuing a fresh notice, allowing sufficient time for reply, and acting in accordance with law.
Final Conclusion: The assessees succeeded because the impugned assessments were set aside for breach of natural justice, while the revenue was left free to recommence proceedings lawfully.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment passed without granting a reasonable opportunity of hearing is vitiated for breach of natural justice and is liable to be quashed.