TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the electronic control unit for electronic power steering and its sub-assembly were classifiable under heading 8708 as parts of motor vehicles or under headings 9032, 8537 or 8543 as claimed by the importer. (ii) Whether the parts of the electronic control unit were classifiable under heading 8708 or under the alternative headings claimed by the importer.
Issue (i): Whether the electronic control unit for electronic power steering and its sub-assembly were classifiable under heading 8708 as parts of motor vehicles or under headings 9032, 8537 or 8543 as claimed by the importer.
Analysis: The goods were found to be meant solely for use in automobiles with power steering and to function as the controlling brain of the steering assistance system. They did not themselves measure speed or torque, nor did they regulate electrical quantities in the sense required for heading 9032. They were also not electrical boards or panels for distribution or control of electricity under heading 8537, and they did not fit the residuary scope of heading 8543. As the goods were essentially parts of the automobile power steering system, and the sub-assembly was only the complete unit without its cover, both were considered classifiable in the same heading. The competing claims under the alternative headings were rejected.
Conclusion: The electronic control unit for electronic power steering and its sub-assembly were correctly classifiable under CTI 8708 94 00, in favour of Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether the parts of the electronic control unit were classifiable under heading 8708 or under the alternative headings claimed by the importer.
Analysis: The classification of the parts depended upon the classification of the complete electronic control unit. Since the unit itself was held not classifiable under headings 9032, 8537 or 8543, the corresponding claims for the parts also failed. The parts remained components of the power steering system and were not shown to fall within the alternative headings asserted by the importer.
Conclusion: The parts of the electronic control unit were also correctly classifiable under CTI 8708 94 00, in favour of Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the Revenue was upheld for the complete unit, the sub-assembly and the parts, and all appeals failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A component that functions as an integral part of a motor vehicle system, and does not satisfy the specific requirements of a more specific competing heading, is classifiable as a motor-vehicle part rather than under an electrical or residuary heading.
TaxTMI 
