<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 253 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758009</link>
    <description>An electronic control unit for electronic power steering, its sub-assembly and related parts were held classifiable as motor-vehicle parts under CTI 8708 94 00 because they functioned solely as integral components of the automobile steering assistance system. The goods did not meet the specific requirements of headings 9032, 8537 or 8543: they did not regulate electrical quantities as automatic control apparatus, were not electrical boards or panels for distribution or control of electricity, and did not fall within the residuary electrical heading. The competing importer classifications were rejected and the Revenue&#039;s classification was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2024 08:19:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=766761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 253 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758009</link>
      <description>An electronic control unit for electronic power steering, its sub-assembly and related parts were held classifiable as motor-vehicle parts under CTI 8708 94 00 because they functioned solely as integral components of the automobile steering assistance system. The goods did not meet the specific requirements of headings 9032, 8537 or 8543: they did not regulate electrical quantities as automatic control apparatus, were not electrical boards or panels for distribution or control of electricity, and did not fall within the residuary electrical heading. The competing importer classifications were rejected and the Revenue&#039;s classification was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=758009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>